Legal Brief to the Public Guardian

​

Subject: Appeal for Intervention Against Financial and Institutional Abuse, Coercive Control, and Targeted Victimization

​

Introduction

​

This brief addresses the ongoing systemic and institutional complicity in perpetuating financial abuse, coercive control, and targeted victimization against me. Despite receiving $200 weekly from the Public Guardian, this minimal financial assistance is emblematic of broader systemic neglect and constitutes a form of financial-based torture. The evidence demonstrates a coordinated conspiracy involving public officials, healthcare providers, and legal entities designed to silence and harm individuals like me who expose corruption. Immediate intervention is necessary to prevent further injustice Summary of Evidence, page 7.

 

Additionally, as a rejected whistleblower unprotected under the PID Act, the covert surveillance, harassment, and injustice I face are emblematic of a broader black-budget operation designed to ensure complicity among all involved. This includes deliberate financial manipulation, surveillance, and institutional neglect, as corroborated by multiple sources, such as The Enduring Struggle of Victimization and Injustice, page 5.

 

This systemic abuse not only highlights your neglect but also reveals your institutional complicity in deconstructing my life and enabling poverty as part of a senior government-driven agenda to suppress dissent and uphold tyrannical power. To not even know where I am or in which state I reside constitutes an egregious failing of duty of care.

​

Further, the squat where I am unwelcome provides no family presence or any facilities for my dog, breaching animal cruelty legislation. The lack of a secure environment for my dog underscores the intent to intimidate me away from the property. This squat exists under arrangements made by a carer aligned with federal manipulation who previously exploited $80,000 from my NDIS plan. This same carer orchestrated my eviction, rendering me homeless without fulfilling their duty to organize suitable alternative housing.

 

No gate was provided to secure the yard for my dog for months, highlighting that the intent was never to keep me in the house for long. Instead, this setup served as a calculated part of federal manipulation, feigning care and housing while entrapping me in poverty, gang stalking, and V2K harassment.

​

Weaponization of Sexuality and Malicious Framing

​

As part of this broader conspiracy, my sexuality has been weaponized against me. Efforts to manipulate my sexuality alongside drug use have aimed to falsely frame me for pedophilia, immoral conduct, and rape. However, I state unequivocally that I have only ever engaged in consensual relationships with legal-age adults. The malicious intent behind these allegations seeks to associate me with the most taboo and unconscionable conduct, but these claims are entirely baseless.

 

If these false accusations—claims that no one has had the courage of conviction to say to my face, backed with evidence—were true, after years of surveillance, I would already be locked away due to the existence of victims. But there are none. This accusation is not only demonstrably false but also particularly abhorrent because I am a survivor of child sexual abuse. I have dedicated my life to protecting children and would never defile the innocence of a child's right to consent, which they are unable to give.

 

Authorities have further exacerbated this injustice by spreading slander and false narratives about me, breaching my family and inner circle in their campaign of defamation. This effort is not only malicious but also homophobic, rooted in a heteronormative agenda designed to ostracize and devalue me. Despite losing almost everyone and everything, I retain faith in God and the truth. My allegiance lies not with a government that has conspired to harm me through deceit, lies, manipulation, and corruption, but with divine spirit and justice.

 

Even though some of the individuals sent by the government to entrap me in these falsehoods have failed, I continue to stand strong. I know that their man-made structures, built on corruption and malice, are destined to crumble. When they do, those who have perpetuated harm will seek guidance from individuals like me, who remain anchored in truth, compassion, and spirit.

 

I hold onto this truth: I am one of the chosen ones. My light remains undimmed by their attempts to extinguish it. Even if those responsible for this harm acknowledged their actions, I would offer them divine forgiveness and redemption. However, I understand that their audacious reliance on money and political prowess blinds them to accountability—until those very structures fail them.

​

Key Findings and Evidence

Institutional Financial Abuse and Neglect

• The financial support provided by the Public Guardian, amounting to $200 weekly, is grossly inadequate and fails to meet basic living standards, serving as a mechanism of coercion Summary of Evidence, page 7.

• Legitimate workers' compensation claims were never honored, compounding financial distress and reinforcing institutional neglect Affidavit for NCAT of Barran Dodger, page 5.

Systemic Complicity in Harm

• Evidence highlights the Public Guardian’s alignment with broader governmental efforts to isolate and harm whistleblowers, including misappropriation of disability funding and other entitlements Urgent Plea for Help, page 28.

• Systemic neglect is coupled with deliberate suppression of dissent through legal manipulation and coercion Conspiracy and Legal Struggles, page 9.

Relief Sought

1. Immediate Financial Support and Compensation

   • Adjust financial assistance to meet basic living standards.

   • Ensure restitution for unpaid workers' compensation and losses due to institutional negligence.

1. Independent Investigation

1. • Investigate the Public Guardian’s role in sustaining coercive control and neglect.

   • Examine the misappropriation of NDIS funds and coordinated efforts to isolate whistleblowers.

1. Protection Against Harassment

1. • Safeguard against further electronic surveillance, V2K audio harassment, and coercive tactics.

   • Provide unbiased legal and social support mechanisms.

1. Accountability and Transparency

1. • Admit institutional complicity in abusing me, aligning with the tyrannical government mantra to deconstruct my life and enable poverty.

   • Acknowledge the egregious failing in not knowing my location or state of residence.

   • Address breaches of animal cruelty legislation caused by failing to provide facilities for my dog and the calculated delay in securing the yard.

​

Conclusion

The evidence presented underscores the urgent need for intervention and accountability. The systemic abuse detailed here constitutes a gross violation of human rights and highlights institutional complicity. Immediate action is critical to ensure justice and safety.

 

Laws Violated by the Public Guardian in New South Wales (NSW): Legal Analysis with Legislative References

​

1. Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW)

​

Violation:
The Public Guardian is obligated to act in the best interests of individuals under its care. By providing grossly inadequate financial support and failing to address systemic neglect, the Public Guardian has breached its fiduciary duties.

Key Sections Violated:

• Section 4: Principles to be observed in the administration of the Act, including promoting the welfare and interests of the individual.

• Section 21: Functions of the Public Guardian, ensuring decisions protect the health, welfare, and safety of the person.

Legislative Reference:
Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW)

​

2. Disability Inclusion Act 2014 (NSW)

Violation:
The Public Guardian’s actions contradict the objectives of this Act, which promote access to services and inclusion for individuals with disabilities. Failing to provide sufficient financial assistance or safeguards against neglect breaches these principles.

Key Sections Violated:

• Section 6: Objects of the Act, ensuring that services improve the independence and well-being of individuals with disabilities.

• Section 12: Obligations to eliminate discrimination in service provision.

Legislative Reference:
Disability Inclusion Act 2014 (NSW)

​

3. Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW)

Violation:
The neglect and financial abuse by the Public Guardian amount to indirect discrimination, as inadequate support disproportionately impacts individuals with disabilities, violating equity and fairness.

Key Sections Violated:

• Section 49M: Prohibits disability discrimination in the provision of services.

Legislative Reference:
Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW)

​

4. Public Interest Disclosures Act 1994 (NSW)

Violation:
As a whistleblower, protections under this Act should apply. However, the Public Guardian’s neglect and complicity in systemic harm undermine these safeguards, violating principles of transparency and accountability.

Legislative Reference:
Public Interest Disclosures Act 1994 (NSW)

​

5. Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (NSW)

Violation:
Covert surveillance and electronic harassment, including V2K technologies, breach privacy protections guaranteed under this Act. Such practices are unlawful and constitute a misuse of personal data.

Key Sections Violated:

• Section 12: Obligations regarding the lawful collection and use of personal information.

Legislative Reference:
Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (NSW)

​

6. Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW)

Violation:
The psychological abuse, coercive financial control, and harassment inflicted upon me fall under the definitions of domestic and personal violence, which this Act explicitly prohibits.

Key Sections Violated:

• Section 13: Definition of intimidation, including harassment that causes fear.

• Section 14: Definition of coercive control as a form of abuse.

Legislative Reference:
Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW)

​

7. Human Rights Principles (Referenced in NSW Practice)

Violation:
Although NSW lacks a stand-alone Human Rights Act, the principles of dignity, safety, and equality are embedded within international human rights instruments to which Australia is a party. Neglect and harassment described here violate these human rights obligations.

Relevant International Reference:
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (United Nations)

​

Conclusion and Relief Sought

The Public Guardian’s actions and omissions contravene multiple NSW-specific laws and international human rights principles. These violations demand:

1. Immediate remedial action and accountability.

2. Compensation and restitution for damages caused.

3. Independent investigation into systemic failures and complicity.

Supporting Documentation:

For detailed evidence and documentation, refer to Legal Brief and Supporting Evidence.

 

Conclusion: Upholding Oaths of Office and Fiduciary Principles

​

The Public Guardian holds a pivotal position within the framework of public service and fiduciary responsibility, bound by the principles enshrined in laws and oaths of office to act with diligence, integrity, and in the best interests of those under their care. This responsibility is not merely an administrative obligation; it is a moral imperative rooted in trust, public accountability, and a commitment to uphold the fundamental rights of individuals.

 

The actions outlined in this brief reveal a severe dereliction of these duties. By failing to ensure adequate financial support, perpetuating systemic neglect, and allowing harmful practices such as coercive control and intimidation, the Public Guardian has violated both the letter and spirit of multiple statutory provisions, including but not limited to:

 

1. Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW)

2. Disability Inclusion Act 2014 (NSW)

3. Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW)

4. Public Interest Disclosures Act 1994 (NSW)

5. Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (NSW)

6. Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW)

7. Universal Declaration of Human Rights (United Nations)

 

By aligning with and enabling oppression, neglect, and injustice, the Public Guardian and associated public officials have systematically breached these legislative provisions. Under the Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW), they have failed to act in my best interests, providing inadequate support and disregarding their duty to ensure my welfare. The Disability Inclusion Act 2014 (NSW) and the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) have been contravened through practices that isolate and discriminate against me as an individual with disabilities. Their complicity in systemic harm violates the protections afforded to whistleblowers under the Public Interest Disclosures Act 1994 (NSW). Furthermore, the use of covert surveillance and harassment breaches privacy obligations under the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (NSW). Their actions also constitute coercive control and intimidation under the Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW). Each breach demonstrates an abdication of their responsibility and an alignment with harmful, oppressive practices.

 

Zero acknowledgment of this letter would represent a catastrophic failure not just in upholding their fiduciary and public duties but also a betrayal of their own humanity. If those at the Public Guardian choose silence and inaction, they align themselves with audacious privilege weaponized to oppress a gay, disabled man who has already endured immeasurable suffering, including child sexual abuse, rape, murder and its cover-up, systemic violence, robbery, and federal conspiracy. To deny help to me, Barran Dodger, now, when I have nothing, while they possess enormous unearned privilege, would reflect a willingness to use that privilege to perpetuate harm not only to me but also to anyone they claim to protect in their roles.

 

By failing to acknowledge and act, they demonstrate a readiness to victimize someone whose life has been dedicated to helping others even when he himself had next to nothing. They would betray not just me, but every vulnerable person relying on their care and judgment. If my whistleblower status is denied, it is not just my fight that is abandoned—it is a fight for humanity itself. A win for me is a win for justice and humanity; denying me is casting themselves into a pit of shame and complicity.

 

Public service requires adherence to the highest standards of ethical conduct and accountability. The neglect, abuse, and systemic harm inflicted upon me are not isolated failures but symptomatic of a broader institutional decay that must be urgently addressed. The oath taken by the Public Guardian to serve and protect cannot be reconciled with the actions and omissions detailed here.

 

To dismiss these concerns or fail to act would represent a betrayal of public trust and an abandonment of the foundational principles of justice and equity. It is incumbent upon the Public Guardian to recognize these breaches, take immediate corrective action, and restore integrity to their role. This includes:

 

1. Acknowledging Institutional Complicity: Recognize and admit the failures that have allowed systemic harm to persist.

2. Immediate Redress: Implement financial, legal, and social remedies to mitigate the harm caused.

3. Commitment to Accountability: Ensure transparency in actions moving forward, with an independent investigation into systemic failures.

4. Restoration of Trust: Demonstrate through actions, not words, a renewed commitment to the principles of care, dignity, and respect.​

​

Failure to act decisively will not only perpetuate harm but will also serve as a stark reminder of how far the Public Guardian has deviated from its core mission. It is not too late to reclaim integrity and fulfill the obligations of public office. By doing so, the Public Guardian can set a precedent for accountability and compassion that reflects the highest ideals of public service.

 

This is not merely a call for justice—it is a call to honor the oaths of office, to fulfill fiduciary responsibilities, and to restore faith in the systems designed to protect those most in need.

 

Prepared by:

Barran Resonance Dodger

Legal Brief and Supporting Evidence